09 December 2025, 7:00 PM
Lismore City Council's final meeting of the year went off with a few points of order and a dispute over who was the meeting's chairman, after Mayor Steve Krieg and Councillor (Cr) Harper Dalton/Earls had a small altercation yesterday.Among the five hours, Crs adopted the Property Portfolio Strategy, approved a Farm Experience at Bexhill, an MOU with NORPA, a footpath for safety reasons at The Channon Public School, and will try to improve safety at Whian Whian Falls.The Property Portfolio Strategy moved into another debate about whether Council should move back into the CBD, as Crs took the opportunity to use council assets to make a point about the Municipal building not been granted to house the Lismore Historical Society and museum.Cr Knight-Smith said the exercise to complete the strategy will "possibly cost over $500,000 without a report, without a business case. Just defer to the GM".Another sticking point was the apparent power being given to the General Manager, Eber Butron."The strategy promises tiered tests and governance, need, function, affordability, optimisation, but in practice, it feels like a signal that the CBD is a move without scrutiny. Defer to the GM, don't look here. Adopting this strategy now bakes in risk, not transparency. If council wants a CBD move, bring back a standalone business case with full costings and benefits. Until then, I oppose adoption."Cr Dalton-Earls was also concerned about the powers of the GM by adding two points in an amendment that included an annual report and an early council notification before a property is sold."There is a lot of concentration to the powers of the GM in the current property strategy, which I'm not speaking to at this particular point. And I just think that this is good governance. An annual report isn't that much. It's probably just churning out what you've already got, but it's covering the whole VCP, rather than looking at them individually and reporting on individual properties."And the second point, just is, clearly, if we're going to divest from something, that councillors get early notification of that, because there is a lot of remit for the GM to make decisions. And I'm not trying to say that that wouldn't happen without earlier councillor notification, but I think that it's important to embed it in policy."The GM clarified that he does not have the delegation to sell any property. Those reports have to come back to council for a council decision.Cr Rob reinforced this in his opposition to the amendment. "I've read the report, and I have no problem with it, because everything has to come back to council for a ratification or resolution. You can't sell a property without the councillors agreeing to it."The amendment vote was lost 8/3.Cr Waters also had concerns about relocating staff to the CBD. "I'm not opposed to some of our business units being down there; however, I do not think operationally it is a good move for our council. So I was, I'm very disappointed that we couldn't wait for this property strategy to be available for us to make these decisions, because this is the framework that we need to make for all our future decisions."So, I'm very happy to see it; if it's applied properly and consistently, it should be more transparent for our decisions and a stronger foundation for the council and the community. It's been a while coming, but I welcome it."Mayor Krieg, a supporter of moving council back into the CBD, said it was easy to focus on one property in the portfolio. "I wonder how many people in our LGA knew that Lismore City Council was responsible for 390 sites. I get accused a lot of favouring sport. I had no idea we had 139 sites in our parks, sports and open space."We had a $52,000 a year return on 139 sites. Unbelievable. We've got 92 sites that are vacant in our LGA, which we are responsible. Council owns three houses, of which earn $6,000 a year in rent. How good would it be to get one of those? We talk about affordable housing, is Council at the forefront?"It's about time we knew exactly what we were responsible for. We knew exactly the cost-benefit analysis is with these properties and how to maximise best use and best return for our ratepayers. We owe it to our 45,000 ratepayers who are paying their rates to be aware of the 390 sites that council is responsible for."Some councillors may have spoken against moving to the CBD but they did support the motion to adopt the Property Portfolio Strategy.Cr Waters said, "The standouts to me in the document is the shift towards resilience and smarter asset management. It's not shying away, but we're living with such things as major floods. It actually addresses this, and I think that is vitally important. We've had major floods, and it's caused enormous damage to our buildings, added years of recovery costs and this strategy will enable council to look hard about future viability, and I think that's really very important."Cr Rob, said, "If this stuff doesn't get managed properly under the property strategy, we're going to go backwards.When it came time to vote, the original motion was passed 9/2, with Crs Knight-Smith and Guise opposed.The development application at Bexhill where a Farm Experience was looking to run for 16 days with a 65 person cap, was debated about making a farm experience lawful versus a history of operating not in compliance, and the impact on the environment and neighbours.Cr Gordon started by saying, "We've heard today that there's many businesses in the surrounding area, farming, other events, there is lots. So why would this be any different from any other business? It's a double standard to think that you can do something on your farm and then everyone else has to not do anything because of what you've done."Cr Guise said this DA had come to a head, "Because it sounds like they've been operating this sort of development, this activity on the land not in compliance with those separate clients historically, and so now they're trying to come and lawfulise what seems to have been non-compliant activities in the past."He also said it would be better in another appropriate venue. "Rather than being plonked in a sensitive environmental area, impacting local roads, neighbours and habitat. These impacts are unacceptable because we're hearing about a koala corridor, an extensive planting on the neighbour's property in very close proximity to these proposed camps. And so, therefore, the noise from these camps, in terms of the amplified music and microphone and speakers, etc, will have an impact on habitat and animals, as well as the traffic movement going to and from the side."Cr Waters spoke against the DA for similar reasons. "I think that actually what we're allowing is going to be too much for this area, including, like, taking into account environmental sensitivities and koala populations, etc. So I don't think that I can actually support this, unfortunately, for those reasons, and the fact that, you know, 36 days with 20 people camping, and then the 16/65, on top of that, is too many in what I believe is happening at the moment."Cr Batista asked the question as to why, when one person plants 30,000 trees on their property, another neighbour is now restricted on what they can do on their own property.Cr Jensen clarified that the DA was actually for 16 days with a threshold of up to 65 people, "Not for 36 like a lot of people seem to be referring to around the room."Cr Hall spoke about the benefit to youth that the DA would have on the community."I'll often passionately get up and speak in the chambers about anything that makes a child's life better, especially in this region. We want to do things that stop them going out onto the streets, that stop them taking drugs, that stop them getting involved in all of these illegal activities and whatnot. The DA we've got in front of us has an opportunity to provide these kids with farming experience, with environmental experience, but also a connection to spirituality. So I'm not sure which way everyone's orientated here, but from what I heard from the applicant, to me, it's nothing but good things."The DA was approved with a 9/2 vote, with Crs Guise and Waters against.The NORPA memorandum of understanding (MOU) was approved by unanimous vote of councillors, who praised the commitment of Lismore's nation-leading performing arts company, which has produced outstanding work, such as Rhoda Roberts 'My Cousin Frank', currently showing at the Sydney Opera House."That contribution is incredibly important for our creative sector, for our identity as a region, and for Lismore and for the stories that come from here and reverberate nationally," Cr Waters said.Mayor Greig also praised NORPA for buying a flood-damaged property, moving into the CBD and renovating it back to glory. He also had a dig at opponents who don't want council to move back to the CBD when he added, "We're in such support of NORPA, as am I, but god forbid that council would think of moving to the CBD as well in a very much flood resilient building. Go NORPA."The Channon Public School footpath revealed some interesting revelations. One being that a portion of The Channon community did not want a footpath to be constructed in the first place. Cr Hall called it a "sticky one" since its inception. Now council was looking to approve the final stage of construction."They said the kids were safe walking on the road. There was a bit of back and forth," Cr Hall said.An Independent Road Safety Audit report was commissioned, which revealed that the road was very dangerous for children walking to and from school."So, I do implore you all to vote for it, even if the background and history is a bit messy," Cr Hall added.Cr Rob said this has been going on for two years, and it astounds him that this would be so difficult to do."We are supposed to be the leaders here. We're supposed to make decisions. Here's one to make. Let's make it."Cr Guise spoke against the motion, declaring that "We still need to listen to the community." Cr Hall said the response rate was 18% of the community.The deciding factor for some councillors was that The Channon Public School supported the footpath being built.Keeping children safe won the day when councillors voted 10/1 to approve the final stage of the footpath.Another issue of safety concern was the lack of parking facilities at Whian Whian Falls as the tourist destination becomes more popular, especially this time of the year.Mayor Krieg put forward a motion that would see Council put in temporary speed measures during bridge repairs in January 2026, write to the Rous GM requesting a car park be built, and work with Rous officials on signage about rubbish and dogs.There was debate about Council not promoting the falls as a tourist destination because of liability; however, the motion was approved unanimously.Lismore City Councillors now have a two-month break. The monthly meetings will return on Tuesday, February 10 2026.