11 December 2025, 6:49 PM
At Tuesday's Lismore City Council meeting, the topic of water security was hotly debated among councillors as they sought to affirm their position and submit it to the Far North Coast Regional Water Supply Project.They also want to request that DCCEEW (Department Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water) and Minister for Water, Rose Jackson, undertake further and more effective consultation with councils and the community with regard to this project.The debate went along party lines, with The Greens' Adam Guise and Virginia Waters, along with Labor's Jasmine Knight-Smith and Harper Dalton-Earls, raising the motion was purely to put the Dunoon Dam back in play, while the conservative independents of Steve Krieg, Jerri Hall, Andrew Bing, Andrew Gordon, Electra Jensen and Gianpeiro Battista, and independent Big Rob, said they wanted all options on the table to make the best decision for the region.The motion was a result of the recent quietly publicised DCCCEEW community meetings in Lismore and the Northern Rivers, where people were asked their thoughts on connecting the Tweed Shire and Rous County Council bulk water systems, building regional desalination plants, integrating town water supplies, using Toonumbar Dam and linking to the South East Queensland Water Grid.It was also resolved at the recent NRJO (Northern Rivers Joint Organisation) meeting that they also submit a formal response for the Far North Coast Regional Water Supply project.The debate involved the majority of the chamber. Cr Guise got the ball rolling, saying, "This is about flogging the dead horse of the Dunoon Dam. And I will be speaking against this. This should be laid to rest. This is about giving cover to keeping the giant mega dam, a 50 gigalitre Dam, on the table when we have moved on from that."Cr Guise said the cost would be well over half a billion dollars, which would take at least a decade to build."The world has moved on since then in terms of water options; we should be investigating things around water efficiency, not having all these water leaks and waste of water in our water network."Mayor Krieg responded by talking about desalination. "Let's look at the options that DCCEEW have put forward; the great green saviour of the world, desalination. Let's build a massive plant powered by that beautiful coal-fired energy right next to the ocean to turn salt water into fresh water for us to drink. All the while, we live in the highest rainfall catchment area of New South Wales. We've got fresh stuff falling from the sky on an almost daily basis, but God forbid we look at capturing it."I can't wait to put my hand up and support 10.9 and tell that state government we don't want desalination. We don't want the solar farms and the wind farms to power our desalination plant that's going to cause an environmental disaster for the coast of Byron Bay and stop the whales from migrating and the dolphins from swimming up the estuary. We want to capture our rainfall. We want to on-sell the purest form of rainfall and water in our area, and that is from the sky."Cr Gordon then spoke about the $600,000 being spent on looking at alternative water security options. "That's simply just investigating. It's about exploring that opportunity, the pros and the cons. So it's been $600,000 spent so far on desal and on recycled water. So, we're halfway, maybe only three-quarters of our way through our investigations."Cr Gordon mentioned that the 14 gigalitres that Rocky Creek Dam holds is not a lot of water to serve the population it does today. "I think it was built to service 20,000 people. It now serves over 100,000 people, and it won't be very long, in a dry spell, that water security will become a very real problem. We don't want to revisit that; that's holding it back, that's holding back the potential of any community."Cr Dalton-Earls then pointed out that the Sydney Water desalination plant costs $22 per person per year. "$22 per year is actually pretty affordable, so you'd use it for the same comparison to Lismore. Similarly, it's backed by 100% renewables. It's not actually coal-powered. And the Regional Water strategy also highlights Toonumbar Dam is underutilised. And I don't see anywhere in this recommendation that it has about capitalising or looking at Toonumbar Dam in terms of connecting up Lismore."Cr Dalton-Earls also mentioned the Dunoon Dam. "So at this point, I think for me, it reads quite political. It doesn't read as in the best interest of the community. I think that this is a political hot potato at the moment, in terms of people trying to push the Dunoon Dam, that has been going for years and that most would benefit places that aren't actually in Lismore. So, Lismore would get the denigration of some of the most beautiful rainforest areas that we're known for, that people come here to travel, and then we would be left with a dam that services mostly outer areas of Lismore. And funnily enough, for the highest water catchment in I think it's Australia, we have the highest water rates."Cr Waters said she believes in water security; however, she is not in support of all of the recommendations of Rous County Council, especially the Dunoon Dam."I mean, the environmental damage and the proposal of the dam, I clearly can't support as a water supply option. It's based on environmental, cultural and community grounds. The proposed site would inundate areas extreme, higher ecological value, and around 80% of the footprint overlaps with Nightcap National Park, one of the most threatened and sensitive landscapes in the region, particularly after the 2019 and 2020 fires. The biodiversity loss and downstream ecological impacts would be significant and irreversible, and the only other thing with this is the safety of the communities below this dam that's being proposed as well."Cr Knight-Smith was another to speak against the motion. "Mostly because I just felt like it was redundant. I don't quite see the purpose that it serves, given that, you know, it's reaffirming a position that is surely already been made aware. And secondly, requesting consultation that's already occurred. I just don't comprehend the purpose. But also, it's important to look at everything, including recycled water. I think that it's important to recognise that water is finite."Cr Battista then had a dig at the politics of water security in the Northern Rivers. "I must say that the Labor Party and The Greens have learned from the Prime Minister, each-way Albo, each way is a good way. One way we say, oh, water security is the most important and vital things of our region. But guess what? We're not doing anything about it."Cr Battista went on to mention that there is growth coming to Lismore and the Northern Rivers, and we need to be prepared."But there'll come a point where we need to seriously start thinking about, where do we going to get the water for our future generation? And we've been looking for 20 years all the way around it, there's no other option but to build a dam."Cr Hall spoke about the economic growth and tourist facilities that building a new dam would have on the community. "Imagine a Big4 right on the side of the Dunoon Dam, water skiing, power boats, stocked fishing grounds. To me, that sounds like a pretty idealistic Lismore, and that's why I vote in support of this one."Cr Jensen mentioned previous community surveys. "Now, when I first moved up here, a survey had recently been conducted, and there was about 13,500 replies. 10,500 of those were in support of the dam or wanted further information. So I'm a bit confused by the fact that some people seem to be saying that no one wants it. I do understand, at some stage in the past, one Green councillor may have said they don't care about the Dunoon Dam or the trees, they just don't want Lismore to grow, which is my understanding."In his right of reply, Cr Rob pointed out that the position of those in favour of the motion just want to put all options on the table. "What that motion is, as the General Manager explained, the summary of council's position to notify DCCEEW, so they can make it very clear that our position actually is everything on the table, not Dunoon Dam, it's everything on the table.""Rous has already progressed the studies for desal and for ground recycled water, and they've priced them out of the market, pretty much. They've put them down to option three and four. So they're still looking at Dunoon Dam, because they're still doing the cultural heritage study, the environmental impact statement."Cr Rob rebutted Cr Dalton-Earls numbers on the Sydney Desal Plant. "Great point, about $22 per household. Now, when you look at Sydney, there's about five and a half million households in the urban area of Sydney. Now you times that by 22, and that's over $120 million a year. $22 sounds great, but it's actually over $120 million a year just to run it. That doesn't count the cost of actually drinking the water that comes out of it, plus the connection fees and everything that goes with it. That's just to run it.He then moved on to Cr Guise's claim of the Dunoon Dam being a mega dam. "I'm going to go into what some of the dams around the country are. And my favourite is actually named after Cr Gordon, who's a supporter of the Dunoon Dam. Lake Gordon, that's 11,146 gigalitres, right. Then, Lake Argyle was 10,431 gigalitres. Lake Eucumbene is 4,366 gigalitres in New South Wales. Dartmouth Dam in Victoria, 3,827 gigalitres, Lake Eldon, Victoria, 3,250 gigalitres. Ours is 14...14 gigalitres. And if we get the Dunoon down, that's 50...five zero, so we'll have a total of 64. That's it. If you call that a mega dam, you don't know what a mega dam is."The vote was carried 7/4, with Crs Jensen, Gordon, Hall, Rob, Battista, Bing, and Krieg voting for and Crs Guise, Waters, Dalton-Earls and Knight-Smith voting against.While the debate continues at all levels of government, water security for a growing population becomes a more serious concern as each year ticks by.