20 December 2024, 3:32 AM
Yesterday's extraordinary Lismore City Council meeting was disrupted by members of the public who were unhappy with a council resolution.There were two rescission motions on the agenda yesterday. Item 11.1 was to rescind its decision from the December 10 meeting to remove all CSG and nuclear-free zone signs and replace them with more welcome or place signs, and 11.2 was to rescind councils decision on moving public access to 9am, before the meeting proper started and having it live streamed.The public gallery was full of people holding what looked to be CSG signs from the successful campaign in 2012, when 87% of the Lismore LGA voted against having a coal seam gas industry in the region.Four public speakers supported the rescission motion, saying how important it was to retain the signs as it part of Lismore's history and a tribute to the 87% who voted no to CSG.Mayor Steve Krieg asked the gallery to abide by the Code of Meeting Practice, which applies to everyone in the chamber."I'll just remind everyone, and I know everyone here is very peaceful and certainly not going to cause any drama, but everyone, public access, speakers, members of the gallery as well as councillors and staff are bound by the code of meeting practice. And although things can get emotional, we are bound by the code of meeting practice, which states that when people are talking, there's to be silence from everyone else, and I know everyone will respect that, but I just wanted to remind everyone about those obligations that we're all under."Unfortunately, this was forgotten following council's vote on the issue.Before the vote, Councillor (Cr) Guise, who moved the motion with Crs Knight-Smith and Waters, said the signs are there with community."It took a whole of community movement to achieve that, and it's worth remembering that was across political spectrums, as people have attested to tonight, it was not just related to a single interest group or a political party. That's what these percentages in the 90% from Community Surveys attest to, and that's what that profound 87% LGA referendum attests to, and that's what proudly sits at the entrances to Lismore."And as speakers have said tonight, we should fly that with pride. We should get a real sense of achievement about achieving that great exercise in democracy, but also, there's not a day I go by or wake up and have deep gratitude for our community, for everyone that stood together to live in a gas field free region."Cr Dalton-Earls asked if this should be the focus of this council at a time when roads, drains, other infrastructure and flood preparedness are more important.Cr Knight-Smith said, "They voted to say that they did not want gas fields in the Lismore LGA, and that's what those signs represent; that we don't want gas fields in the Lismore LGA. Those signs are beautiful. They represent a beautiful thing, a beautiful community, our community. They represent rolling hills and farms. They represent our pristine national parks. They represent a lifestyle that we've all come to love and enjoy. So, my vote won't be changing."Mayor Krieg stood to speak on the issue stating he was in a "No win situation. And I know I'm going to cop it.""This is for me, not about turning Lismore and the LGA into a gas field. It is a very honourable act that happened at Bentley. I drive past there often on my way to work, and that has solidified the Lismore LGA's right to be gas free and nuclear free. That is not what this motion is about in my opinion."I'm not going to get on the phone straight after this meeting to see Montgomery Burns from the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant and say after this motion, there is an opportunity here. That is not what this is about. This is about modifying some signage at the entrance ways to our city and to our villages to welcome people to Lismore."Everyone has their own opinions as to what those signs represent, and those opinions are more than valid. And, I accept that the 60 or so people that emailed me, I am grateful, and I read every single one, and I tried to reply to every single one, whether I did or not, if I didn't, I apologise. But the reality is everyone has an opinion. The reality is that this is not going to open up Lismore to become a gas-friendly city or a nuclear-friendly city. That is not the case."The voices of the people have clearly spoken on this. What it is about is welcoming people at our entranceways to our city and our villages with uniform, modern, fresh signage. And that's what I want to see for Lismore, and it's as simple as that, so I'm going to stick with my original decision."The vote was Crs Guise, Dalton-Earls, Knight-Smith and Waters voting for the rescission motion and Crs Gordon, Hall, Battista, Rob, Bing and Krieg voting against. So, the motion was defeated 4/6, with Cr Jensen on leave.It was at this time that Mayor Krieg attempted to move the meeting to the next item on the agenda. However, the public gallery began to leave, with some loudly expressing their disappointment in the result going against the mayors advice at the start of the meeting.Cr Rob became defensive and asked the gallery to leave quietly with the mayor asking him to be quiet. The gallery then proceeded to make more noise outside the chamber through what sounded like a chant.The mayor introduced 11.2, the rescission motion on Public Access, ironically, with the chant clearly being heard in the background.Cr Guise moved this motion and started by saying, "I will speak to this. Another rescission. But there's a bit of a theme going tonight, so I will repeat what I said last meeting in dealing with this item, which is this, to me, is a backward step in democracy and the way that we treat our community."Mayor Krieg then left the chamber to speak to those involved as Cr Guise asked for the chamber doors to remain open, "I understand that there's some noise disruption, but we would adjourn it in that case. But closing the chamber isn't, as far as I'm aware, lawful."Finally, order was restored, and Cr Guise continued.The arguments against were the same as the December 10 meeting, starting at 9am, so not having it part of the monthly council meeting, limiting the number of speakers to two for and two against, limiting the meetings to five hours and not being accountable to the community.Those speaking against the rescission motion pointed out that nothing has happened yet, so all the talk was just that, talk that is casting aspersions on councillors not showing up for public access at 9am. Mayor Krieg called that "The height of arrogance."The vote was again 4/6, with Crs Rob, Guise, Waters and Knight-Smith for and Crs Dalton-Earls, Gordon, Battista, Hall, Bing and Krieg against.The result does mean the public access changes will start from the February 2025 meeting. It means the changes will be put on public exhibition for 42 days. The submissions received will be shared with council and then it will be tabled, debated and voted on in early 2025.That is the council wrap for 2024. We can only hope that councillor behaviour and the public gallery behaviour will be more respectful of the Code of Meeting Practice in 2025.